Skepticism to clairvoyance

      2 Comments on Skepticism to clairvoyance

Clairvoyance is the ability to see what happens at a distance

Scepticiscm to claivoiance image

Clairvoyance can cross time and space. Receive a picture on your inner mind of what’s going on at another location or at another time. It is consciousness that gets the credit for this ability to be possible.

How can something like clairvoyance work?

We have to be sceptical of extraordinary claims. Clairvoyance is braking a lot of known physical laws. It implies vast things about our reality that mainstream science has to discover if it were to work.

If the brain is simply an electrical signal, it would not be possible to receive information from a distance location. Here one could speculate about electrical signals transferred over great distances. If this were the case, it would be possible to detect these signals or fields when somebody gets a clairvoyant hit.

If the explanation for psychic experiences is not an electrical signal transferred between minds or places, then another reason would be that we all live in a simulator—another huge implication about how our worlds work. So far, not proven with any physical experiment in the field of physics.

Another thing to be sceptical too is where all this information is stored? Believers talk about tapping into a database – where is this database located? And one might ask what happens if this database gets destroyed or hacked?

My last sceptical question here is – If Clairvoyance abilities were fundamental, why are not more people using these abilities?

How does the format and mechanism of clairvoyance work?

We know that when you sense something with your physical senses, the brain stores this information. Compared to a dream, the brain deletes most impressions because it is not accurate and regarded as noise for the brain. With this in mind, it is natural to ask the question – Is psychic data stored in the brain just as physical impressions? OR does psychical experiences get erased just like dreams? I would be somewhat sceptical to someone claiming to have many psychic hits but can’t remember them.

Also, does a person have to be in a particular mental state to “receive”? What happens if you open your eyes too soon, or somebody else disturbs you under a psychic episode. And how long can you be in these trance states of receiving mental images? Few seconds, minutes, hours or days? And lastly, is it possible to get a clairvoyant picture that gets put over your physical vision, so what you see in front of you get disturbed. An example of this would be to ride a bicycle in an open field, and you “see” a massive tree in front of you that is not there.

Scepticiscm to claivoiance image2

The believers of psychic sensing say they can see the truth on an inner screen.

The question is, does the mental screen always stay the same? Or does the mental screen change in size or even in shape – From square to circle, for example. Is it possible to be both psychic in awake and in dreams? And how can you differentiate between common visions and Dreams receiving ESP?

What about the quality of the pictures? How does that work? Do psychics receive the same quality, or do some have a rate that clairvoyant people can compare to VHS, and others have quality compared to blue ray? And what about blind people? Can they also “see” in their inner minds? Can deaf people “hear” using psychic means?

Also, is it possible to control this ability – can you decide when clairvoyance images show up? Because the mental pictures show up randomly, then in the worst case, you might drive a car, and suddenly you get bombarded with psychic impressions. For this to be controllable, you have to choose to focus on both time and location. And you have to wonder if there are any limitations to the magic.

Are everything objects, places, and situations similar in attractiveness, or are there any substances that “shine” more than another thing? Meaning, is there anything more attractive than others?

Anomalies of clairvoyance

If it were possible to see things in your mind that happens in the distance, it would be possible to be disturbed by some of these images. For example, “seeing” war crimes and the like. It might also be possible to see a situation where it is much lighter, and it could activate an Eplepsi episode. If you were to tune your mind into a conversation, let’s say a hypnotic session, you could get hypnotised! The same goes with the smell; if you were to Psychic pick up some smells or taste, you could puke by the smell or taste of it.

Another interesting question arises, is it possible to threaten people to see things for you? Or is it possible to give people medication, so they get into this state? What about spying and stalking. It would be unfair if some people have these mind powers while others do not. In this regard, you might ask if it is possible to block the people spying on you.

The most pressing question is whether a person can make a distinction between fantasy and fact. Because if you “see” in your mind’s eye that your neighbour has kidnapped someone in their basement, it is rather unfortunate if this is not the case.

And does clairvoyance mimic reality? For example, if you explore the bottom of the ocean in your mind’s eye, would you see anything at all? We know that the bottom of the sea is pitch black! The same can be said about the sun; looking into the sun with a psychic vision, would you not get blind?

Is clairvoyant deterministic?

If one could see the future, this implies that the future is sett. The implication here is a deterministic reality. Then the question arises, if one can see the future, can we predict peoples crime before they do it? Is this something a court could use – to put a person in jail who have never done anything, but the clairvoyant information suggest he is GOING TO!

Sociological questions

If clairvoyance abilities exist, should they not be taught in public school? Should it be taught for free or only to rich people?

What will happen with secrets in this world? A world without secrets? Will every illusion in society then become visible for all to see?

Can the police use psychic abilities to find missing persons? And, can everybody develop these powers, no matter gender, race, nationality or IQ?

And does these powers come from legacy or the environment? If it comes from the environment, a child learns this from, for example, the parents. If it is genes, then you can predict a psychic child. Also, with genetic engineering, you can create SUPER PSCHYIC’s.

Read the believers perspective of clairvoyance here:
https://abundance7.com/clairvoyance/

2 comments on “Skepticism to clairvoyance

  1. Laylah

    Wow! How many nuances there are in this post! So many interesting questions.
    Keep ongoing with the sceptical series; it’s fun to read!

    It’s good to see such topics from BOTH sides.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *